The Different Cameras in My Life
What follows below is the love story, my love story with the various cameras that came in went in my storied camera life, as I went searching for the 'perfect' one. I am very passionate about cameras. I love reading about their legacies, their special places in history and the impact they made. I was surprised to see that there were already a big list of cameras that I had the opportunity to own and use. These are big blessings to me as I found joy in engaging in this endeavor.
Sony DSC-P50 (acquired in 2001)
My first digital camera which I could call mine. I got this brand new in 2001, and it cost around $400 at the time, and was given as a gift. I still have this with me, and it still works, although I do not have a memory stick for this one (accepts 16-128mb memory sticks only). I loved the colors and sharpness this camera produced in bright sunny outdoor situations. Indoors it is a different story. It struggles and the flash just makes the subjects look unappealing. It has a tendency to produce reddish/orange shots indoors. Noise indoors is prevalent as well.
Sony DSC-L1 (acquired in 2003)
I got this camera from a person who won this as a prize in a raffle in 2003-2004. Since he was not a camera-type-of-guy he sold this for half the price at that time ($200). My dad got this but eventuall gave this to me due to non-use. The Sony L1 was a most welcome upgrade from the DSC-P50. Noticeable immediately was the start up time and the image quality. It was a huge leap forwards in terms of image quality. It was also ready to accept higher-capacity memory sticks, which is a welcome change. The size is also way cuter and battery life was better. I used this exclusively for my USA trip in 2005. I was having a blast with this and I was appreciating the improvement in image quality. Indoors, it was a bit better than the P50 as well. I still have this with me, although there is some problem with the lens mechanism.
Toshiba PDR-4300 (acquired in 2004)
This came as a gift from my uncle. Upon seeing it I was immediately repulsed by its large size and 'unappealing' looks. But quality wise it beats my L1. I was still reluctant to use this camera for a long time (I stuck with my L1) but what eventually won me over was its unmistakable superior image quality (compared to the L1). It was powered by 4 AA batteries and has an optical viewfinder (which during the time I diskliked). Now one of the first things I look for in a camera is a viewfinder! I still have this with me although I haven't tested it if it still would work.
CDR-King DV-2000 (acquired in 2006)
Heaven knows why I jumped in and got a CDR-King DV-2000. Got this in 2006-2007. Perhaps it was its pistol style form? I lusted for a Sanyo Xacti, but the price is just out of my reach.
This camera's image quality is sub par and the battery life is dismal. However, this is the camera which I used to document my first-ever trip to Japan (facepalm). I was aware that the image quality is quite bad (even outdoors), but nevertheless I remember the thrill I had when using this during my trip. I was thinking that I have with me a tiny video/camera hybrid that no one notices and I just shot away. I eventually gave this camera away.
This camera's image quality is sub par and the battery life is dismal. However, this is the camera which I used to document my first-ever trip to Japan (facepalm). I was aware that the image quality is quite bad (even outdoors), but nevertheless I remember the thrill I had when using this during my trip. I was thinking that I have with me a tiny video/camera hybrid that no one notices and I just shot away. I eventually gave this camera away.
Panasonic TZ-3 (acquired in 2007 in Japan)
The Panasonic TZ-3 is the first camera which I spent sleepless nights mulling over. This is the first camera where I really read those reviews on the net and really did a comparison among other candidates. Whereas before I got cameras as presents, this time I said I would really want to make an informed decision. Off I went to Japan in 2007 and I got this at Yodobashi Camera store. It was truly a great buy. I marveled at its superiority in image quality, build, speed, functions and battery life compared to all my previous cameras. The TZ-3 really is a work of art and I was a very happy shooter then. I brought this cam with me in most of my trips and it did deliver in most cases. However during the time I wasn't very particular yet with stuff like low-light capabilities, dynamic range, bokeh etc. For a while I believed that my images from this camera could not be improved upon anymore, that is until later I got a true camera - a DSLR. I recently sold this camera (still in excellent shape).
A testament to its image quality - I have a blown-up photo taken with the TZ3 which still hangs on our wall at home.
A testament to its image quality - I have a blown-up photo taken with the TZ3 which still hangs on our wall at home.
Nikon D40 (acquired in 2008)
My first DSLR. This camera was a revelation and a milestone in my storied journey in the camera world. For the first time I was really impressed as to how I could zoom in my pictures and still see all the details from my shots. In my Panasonic TZ3, I would zoom in a photo and all I would get are watercolor-like smudges in my images. None of that with the D40. Shots would come out razor sharp, even with the kit lens. It was a big improvement also in the way I would take photos. I would notice that using a ViewFinder changed my outlook. I got the desire to compose shots, not just to shoot away like crazy.
However it was still long way before I introduced the use of Flashes. Before I always thought that flashes are supposed to be shot in front of the subject. I wasn't even aware yet of the existence of "Trigger Flashes" or master-slave flashes. But that was still far off.
I got an SB400 for this camera and noticed immediately the awesome effect bounce flashing can do for your subjects. It looked soo much natural and better than just firing the flash head on. I still have the D40 as a 'backup'
However it was still long way before I introduced the use of Flashes. Before I always thought that flashes are supposed to be shot in front of the subject. I wasn't even aware yet of the existence of "Trigger Flashes" or master-slave flashes. But that was still far off.
I got an SB400 for this camera and noticed immediately the awesome effect bounce flashing can do for your subjects. It looked soo much natural and better than just firing the flash head on. I still have the D40 as a 'backup'
DXG-569V (acquired in 2009)
I was still awe-struck by the looks of the Xacti, but the price is still way above my budget, and so I jumped on the DXG-569V, which looks I was greatly attracted to. Video quality from this was a revelation to me when I was first introduced to the magical world of 720p. Motion was so fluid (quite unlike from any camera I ever had) and the video resolution was worlds apart from the CDRKING DV2000. The wide-screen video aspect was the most welcome change (I was used to the videos from the TZ3).
I took this with me wherever I went, and shot away videos from almost anything I could shoot with. It was good, but the sour thing was the audio quality. I can't even make up what people were saying in the videos - even if my subject is just in front of me. Sold this eventually, but not before I have taken this little camcorder to far reaching places in the country. The form factor is still lovely in my eyes, but the overall performance of this camcorder is just about average. I let it go.
I took this with me wherever I went, and shot away videos from almost anything I could shoot with. It was good, but the sour thing was the audio quality. I can't even make up what people were saying in the videos - even if my subject is just in front of me. Sold this eventually, but not before I have taken this little camcorder to far reaching places in the country. The form factor is still lovely in my eyes, but the overall performance of this camcorder is just about average. I let it go.
Nikon D70 (acquired in 2010)
I got the D70 as an upgrade to my D40. The D70 accepts old AF lenses from Nikon, whereas the D40 cannot. I appreciate the appearance of the side LCD on the D70, but I didn't like the fact it uses CF cards, not SD Cards. Finally I was able to use some old primes in the D70 and for a while I was content.
One of the gripes I had with the D70 was the greenish tint I get with some of my shots with it. Also, the LCD screen is quite little (even compared with the D40)
And of course, its use of the CF Card.
Aside from those, it's a great DSLR and in the right hands, it can produce great images.
Still, I was yearning for something better than it. The D200 was way above my budget at the time. It was then when I got the chance to use a D90. I was blown away by its speed, quickness and High ISO capabilities. It was way ahead of the D70 in ergonomics, functions and yes, image quality. Pretty soon I decided to part with my D70 and went looking for the D90.
One of the gripes I had with the D70 was the greenish tint I get with some of my shots with it. Also, the LCD screen is quite little (even compared with the D40)
And of course, its use of the CF Card.
Aside from those, it's a great DSLR and in the right hands, it can produce great images.
Still, I was yearning for something better than it. The D200 was way above my budget at the time. It was then when I got the chance to use a D90. I was blown away by its speed, quickness and High ISO capabilities. It was way ahead of the D70 in ergonomics, functions and yes, image quality. Pretty soon I decided to part with my D70 and went looking for the D90.
Nikon D90 (acquired in 2010)
My main workhorse. I've had countless enjoyable moments with my D90 and its acquisition paved the way for me to new paths which were previously unknown to me. Everything about it is great - image quality, responsiveness, ergonomics - the D90 just has it all. If there is a gripe - I would say that the D90 produces images which have an orange tint on them - but this can easily be remedied in post processing. Battery life is outstanding - I get around 1200 shots per charge. It is built very solidly, unlike some of its Canon counterparts.
I have tried tons of lenses on it already and the most used is the Samyang 85mm manual focus lens. Hmm perhaps I should create a separate article for my lenses?
I have tried tons of lenses on it already and the most used is the Samyang 85mm manual focus lens. Hmm perhaps I should create a separate article for my lenses?
Fuji Finepix F10 (acquired in 2010)
What followed was a search for small cameras which could deliver impressive image quality. Enter the Finepix F10. Got this off from Ebay for just 30 dollars (used) and was wowed immediately by what it can do. Battery lasts forever (I was getting 1000 shots from a single charge) and the image quality - oh my the image quality outdoors was divine.
I used this as my camera to document my mountain climbing trip in 2010 and the image I got there was comparable to my D40! - so far as viewing on the web is concerned).
People just wouldn't believe that all my shots that I developed were from this little gem. It as fantastic low light capabilities (beats my TZ3 easily) and the noise - what noise?
I still have this with me as a go-ahead digicam. Still works. Still carries that long charge. Indoors it is capable but the white balance is not so good. Nevertheless, it does very well outdoors and that was what got me hooked. It also is one of the best cameras in 2007.
I used this as my camera to document my mountain climbing trip in 2010 and the image I got there was comparable to my D40! - so far as viewing on the web is concerned).
People just wouldn't believe that all my shots that I developed were from this little gem. It as fantastic low light capabilities (beats my TZ3 easily) and the noise - what noise?
I still have this with me as a go-ahead digicam. Still works. Still carries that long charge. Indoors it is capable but the white balance is not so good. Nevertheless, it does very well outdoors and that was what got me hooked. It also is one of the best cameras in 2007.
Casio EX-V7 (acquired in 2010)
By this time I was taken aback by the form factor of the F10. I was looking for something which can have its image quality but also possess a more appealing form factor.
The Casio EX-V7 appeared to me as the answer. Its looks is truly beautiful (I still love it today), and the fact that it does not have a protruding lens mechanism added to my delight. I was well aware of the problems that can occur by having a camera's lens open while inside your bag or pocket. With the EX-V7, this is no problem.
Upon playing with it, I noticed that the menu/controls were more like coming from a toy camera, not something serious. The previews I see are not sharp looking and the colors are just not reliable. Metering with this camera is the biggest problem. Outdoors, it could perform on par with the TZ3 but indoors, it's just not in the same league as the average cameras. I am aware of TZ3's tendency to produce high noise indoors, but the EX-V7 just cannot compete on the same footing. Details are just not there, and the dynamic range just sucked. You have to go manual to bring out acceptable photos from this camera. All in all, another disappointment. I sold it later.
The Casio EX-V7 appeared to me as the answer. Its looks is truly beautiful (I still love it today), and the fact that it does not have a protruding lens mechanism added to my delight. I was well aware of the problems that can occur by having a camera's lens open while inside your bag or pocket. With the EX-V7, this is no problem.
Upon playing with it, I noticed that the menu/controls were more like coming from a toy camera, not something serious. The previews I see are not sharp looking and the colors are just not reliable. Metering with this camera is the biggest problem. Outdoors, it could perform on par with the TZ3 but indoors, it's just not in the same league as the average cameras. I am aware of TZ3's tendency to produce high noise indoors, but the EX-V7 just cannot compete on the same footing. Details are just not there, and the dynamic range just sucked. You have to go manual to bring out acceptable photos from this camera. All in all, another disappointment. I sold it later.
Fuji Finepix F200 EXR (acquired in 2010)
Spurned by my awe of the F10, naturally I began looking for an upgrade. I was loving the Fuji image quality. This led me to the F200 EXR. Billed as a point and shoot that rivals DSLRs in certain conditions, I was again hooked with the reviews and got this little baby (used) in Ebay. Detail in the photos I took with this camera is impressive and it was also able to handle low light scenarios better than the F10 or TZ3. Battery life was weaker (just 300 shots a charge) but to solve that I bought an extra battery. Much as I enjoyed its superior detailed photos, I was still looking for the F10 touch. It was not quite seen in the F200 EXR. I used this cam for parties, meetings etc and it didn't disappoint, but I was not thrilled with it either. Eventually this camera found its way in the cabinet and eventually I sold this camera. I still kept my F10.
Sony HX5-V (acquired in 2010)
I was still restless as the F200 EXR didn't quite live up to my expectations. Then came the Sony HX5-V. It has all the bells and whistles I would want - panorama, low light mode etc), and I was expecting to relive my initial joys when I had my Sony DSC-P50.
This camera is a mixed bag. In some situations it did remarkably well, and sometimes it didn't. What is prevalent in all shots was the unmistakable Sony-Colors which I found rather unappealing and synthetic looking. Colors even outdoors look washed out and nothing really made it to my keepers-list. My Finepix F10 has more keepers than this!
I used this for some big events and trips but the images it produced didn't really ring a bell to me and again I was disappointed with the image quality. I soon sold this camera.
This camera is a mixed bag. In some situations it did remarkably well, and sometimes it didn't. What is prevalent in all shots was the unmistakable Sony-Colors which I found rather unappealing and synthetic looking. Colors even outdoors look washed out and nothing really made it to my keepers-list. My Finepix F10 has more keepers than this!
I used this for some big events and trips but the images it produced didn't really ring a bell to me and again I was disappointed with the image quality. I soon sold this camera.
Creative Vado HD (acquired in 2010)
I decided that it was time to have a break from the digital still-cameras and look at video cameras. During the time the choices were the Vado, the Kodak Zi8 and the Flip. Chris Pirillo's conviction that the Vado is the best of the three pushed me to choose this. I wasn't disappointed. Even though it has no photo-camera function (you have to cut scenes from the video to get pics), it was a joy to use. It performs well in low light, has the widest angle of all pocket camcorders, and it looked so unassuming, that people mistake it for a phone.
Sound was mono, which was a minor setback, and zoom was only digital, but aside from those, this little camcorder remained my go-to-cam for videos.
I have made tons of videos using this camcorder and it was just about great for my purposes (even though it has a tendency to show a orange tint especially indoors).
Eventually the battery connectors failed and soon the camcorder couldn't even detect a battery in its compartment. I tried everything but couldn't get it to work. I bought new batteries, tried aluminum, still nothing. Finally I retired this camcorder after a few years of use. Some of my most popular videos in youtube were shot with this.
Sound was mono, which was a minor setback, and zoom was only digital, but aside from those, this little camcorder remained my go-to-cam for videos.
I have made tons of videos using this camcorder and it was just about great for my purposes (even though it has a tendency to show a orange tint especially indoors).
Eventually the battery connectors failed and soon the camcorder couldn't even detect a battery in its compartment. I tried everything but couldn't get it to work. I bought new batteries, tried aluminum, still nothing. Finally I retired this camcorder after a few years of use. Some of my most popular videos in youtube were shot with this.
Samsung HX100 (acquired in 2010)
My first 'serious' camcorder. There were higher end models such as HX200 etc which are priced $799, but essentially it is identical with the lowly HX100 (the high end models just come with built in memory). Got this at a bargain.
I was intrigued with its time lapse function and impressive optical zoom plus the amazing image stabilizer (you have to see it in action - it just works)
It is not really a wide-angle camcorder, which is the first of my gripes with the Samsung H100. Low light scenarios can be a problem. It doesn't perform very well indoors. In the photo department, it is a slouch. Beside that, it performs as it should and its strengths are where it really shines.
I used this to film an entire wedding using 2 batteries. Motion was very smooth. File sizes were quite large. Eventually I realized that I don't need this type of form factor, and so I sold it later on.
I was intrigued with its time lapse function and impressive optical zoom plus the amazing image stabilizer (you have to see it in action - it just works)
It is not really a wide-angle camcorder, which is the first of my gripes with the Samsung H100. Low light scenarios can be a problem. It doesn't perform very well indoors. In the photo department, it is a slouch. Beside that, it performs as it should and its strengths are where it really shines.
I used this to film an entire wedding using 2 batteries. Motion was very smooth. File sizes were quite large. Eventually I realized that I don't need this type of form factor, and so I sold it later on.
Panasonic LX5 (acquired in 2011)
This turned out to be one of my favorite cameras ever. Super sharp (f2.0!) small, stylish, can accept hotshoe flashes (I have Yong Nuo 560 and wireless triggers). Battery life is great (400-500 shots per charge). Image quality is impressive outdoors, almost SLR like. Indoors it is acceptable (for facebook etc). Video quality is just superb. Very quick autofocus, and very easy to navigate. I especially like the quick controls to the aspect ratio. I feel I shoot in any lighting situation and the LX5 can deliver. It can meter very well. Exposures are always reliable. Brought this on many events and it delivered very well. I even used this for a photoshoot! It performed well.
This is best used for architecture/nature shots. Dez Santana's shots are what convinced me to get the LX5. He was able to bring out the power of the LX5 in his shots.
I just noticed it produces a greenish tint in its photos indoors. Post processing photos from indoor shots can be very difficult and it is capable of producing artifacts.
Overall, a serious little cam capable of producing wonders. I eventually sold it to finance an upgrade. There was a point in time where I was ready to say that if I can only have a single compact camera, this would be it.
This is best used for architecture/nature shots. Dez Santana's shots are what convinced me to get the LX5. He was able to bring out the power of the LX5 in his shots.
I just noticed it produces a greenish tint in its photos indoors. Post processing photos from indoor shots can be very difficult and it is capable of producing artifacts.
Overall, a serious little cam capable of producing wonders. I eventually sold it to finance an upgrade. There was a point in time where I was ready to say that if I can only have a single compact camera, this would be it.
Sony U20 (acquired in 2011)
The Following four cameras are acquired with a sense of preserving a piece of photographic history. The following four cameras were all bought second hand and at a very low price. Quality wise, they were all no match for even the lowliest of today's cellphone cameras, but they were still collected because each played an important part in the history of photography.
The Sony U20: I got this because:
1. It is soo cute
2. It uses AAA batteries
3. Somebody was selling it for such a bargain price
This tiny (really tiny!) camera was a hit during 2002-2003 and of course, during its release, it was priced around 300-400 dollars. Now you can get one of these for 25 dollars).
I got one in mint condition and was instantly loving its very cool form factor. It's almost as big as a pack of gum. Quality from this camera is comparable to the DSC-P50. I challenge myself nowadays to try to "capture shots that would be comparable to a shot taken with a DSLR". I try the said challenge using oldies like the U20 or the G3...and these old gems can still do it!
Why do I still get ancient artifacts like this? I remember the days before when these cameras were new, and everyone was saying how amazing these things are, but couldn't afford them because of the insane prices. When I use these old cameras, I imagine myself back in the day, when the G3 for example cost around 800 dollars and the Fuji F4700 cost around 700 dollars, or the Sony Mavica FD88 which initially was priced around 1,000 dollars, and I say to myself - this camera was once sold for $1,000. Now I got it for just $25. Isn't that swell? :)
The Sony U20: I got this because:
1. It is soo cute
2. It uses AAA batteries
3. Somebody was selling it for such a bargain price
This tiny (really tiny!) camera was a hit during 2002-2003 and of course, during its release, it was priced around 300-400 dollars. Now you can get one of these for 25 dollars).
I got one in mint condition and was instantly loving its very cool form factor. It's almost as big as a pack of gum. Quality from this camera is comparable to the DSC-P50. I challenge myself nowadays to try to "capture shots that would be comparable to a shot taken with a DSLR". I try the said challenge using oldies like the U20 or the G3...and these old gems can still do it!
Why do I still get ancient artifacts like this? I remember the days before when these cameras were new, and everyone was saying how amazing these things are, but couldn't afford them because of the insane prices. When I use these old cameras, I imagine myself back in the day, when the G3 for example cost around 800 dollars and the Fuji F4700 cost around 700 dollars, or the Sony Mavica FD88 which initially was priced around 1,000 dollars, and I say to myself - this camera was once sold for $1,000. Now I got it for just $25. Isn't that swell? :)
Fuji Finepix 4700 (acquired in 2011)
Canon G3 (acquired in 2011)
Sony Mavica FD-88 (acquired in 2011)
Canon SD 780 (acquired in 2011)
Olympus EPL-1 (acquired in 2012)
Truly an amazing camera. I usually have to edit or enhance my photos in the computer (even those from higher end cameras like the D90), but with the EPL1, I hardly need to. I just upload them straight away!
Initially I found the EPL1 to handle just about any lighting situation there is with a Panasonic 20mm 1.7 lens. It just performs. Autofocus is albeit, slow but the image quality is there. I love the Olympus color rendition (warm) and I thought my search for the D90 replacement has come at last.
Still, upon further tests, I discovered that although the EPL1's image is good straight out of the camera, it is not very tweakable in post processing, like the D90. It is basically a OOC camera that needs no post processing. Doing so could probably only make the image slightly better, or even worse. WIth the D90, the images could initially be not as good as those from the EPL-1, but AFTER post processing, the D90's images beat the EPL-1 easily.
Never before have I used a camera that needs almost no post processing! That's how good the EPL-1 is. But it lacks a certain something from the D90, and I feel that as good as it may be, the EPL-1 is no replacement for a DSLR.
Initially I found the EPL1 to handle just about any lighting situation there is with a Panasonic 20mm 1.7 lens. It just performs. Autofocus is albeit, slow but the image quality is there. I love the Olympus color rendition (warm) and I thought my search for the D90 replacement has come at last.
Still, upon further tests, I discovered that although the EPL1's image is good straight out of the camera, it is not very tweakable in post processing, like the D90. It is basically a OOC camera that needs no post processing. Doing so could probably only make the image slightly better, or even worse. WIth the D90, the images could initially be not as good as those from the EPL-1, but AFTER post processing, the D90's images beat the EPL-1 easily.
Never before have I used a camera that needs almost no post processing! That's how good the EPL-1 is. But it lacks a certain something from the D90, and I feel that as good as it may be, the EPL-1 is no replacement for a DSLR.
Olympus EPM-1 (acquired in 2012)
Cute, Tiny, Slim, and Fast, Fast, Fast! The EPM-1 is 2 generations better than the EPL-1 (although they share the same image sensor). Although lacking in tactile controls, the EPM-1 is just a breeze to use. I still get the same confidence when using the EPM-1: I trust its white balance so much that I am sure pictures taken with it will, in all probability, turn out well.
As good as the EPM-1 is compared to the EPL-1, there are still some things that are missing and just cannot get from their 12 megapixel sensor. I have heard that the EPM-1 is directly comparable to the marvelous EP-3. However, images still cannot be stretched any further from their OOC jpegs. They look good straight out of the camera, but any DSLR can still beat them Image-Quality wise in post processing.
In a nutshell, the EPM-1 can beat all the LX5's, S100's and XZ-1's out there, but they are still a step below a DSLR.
As good as the EPM-1 is compared to the EPL-1, there are still some things that are missing and just cannot get from their 12 megapixel sensor. I have heard that the EPM-1 is directly comparable to the marvelous EP-3. However, images still cannot be stretched any further from their OOC jpegs. They look good straight out of the camera, but any DSLR can still beat them Image-Quality wise in post processing.
In a nutshell, the EPM-1 can beat all the LX5's, S100's and XZ-1's out there, but they are still a step below a DSLR.
Fuji Finepix X100 (acquired in 2012)
This major acquisition came about after I insisted on Image Quality above all. I think I have found the (almost) perfect walkabout camera!
AF is not as snappy as the "World's fastest AF camera EPM1" but image quality wise, the X100 blows the EPM-1 out of the water.
Like the LX5 and EPL1 and EPM1, I get that same or even more confidence of shooting with the X100 under ALL lighting conditions, and still nailing the right White Balance and Exposure. This camera is utterly amazing when it comes to getting it right.
The looks - that retro look is just lovely! The X100 is just begging for you to use it. It is such a pleasure to use. The fact that I can use f2.0 with 1/500 or even 1/1000 speeds is lovely. Images abound in the internet showcasing the many wonderful images this camera is capable of producing.
AF is not as snappy as the "World's fastest AF camera EPM1" but image quality wise, the X100 blows the EPM-1 out of the water.
Like the LX5 and EPL1 and EPM1, I get that same or even more confidence of shooting with the X100 under ALL lighting conditions, and still nailing the right White Balance and Exposure. This camera is utterly amazing when it comes to getting it right.
The looks - that retro look is just lovely! The X100 is just begging for you to use it. It is such a pleasure to use. The fact that I can use f2.0 with 1/500 or even 1/1000 speeds is lovely. Images abound in the internet showcasing the many wonderful images this camera is capable of producing.
Olympus OMD-EM5 (acquired in 2013)
The camera that I can truly say, blows the D90 out of the water. It has the retro looks that I love, it has a blazingly fast AF, its low-light capabilities is remarkable...and it is tiny!
With this camera, I was finally able to make that jump from DSLR cameras to CSC's.
Comparing this with the beloved X100, I'd say that the X100 beats the OMD in colors, High Iso, Jpegs and RAW. However, the major letdown of the X100 is its slow AF, which eventually led to it being sold in 2013. It was a parting which would lead me to search for a suitable replacement.
The camera that I can truly say, blows the D90 out of the water. It has the retro looks that I love, it has a blazingly fast AF, its low-light capabilities is remarkable...and it is tiny!
With this camera, I was finally able to make that jump from DSLR cameras to CSC's.
Comparing this with the beloved X100, I'd say that the X100 beats the OMD in colors, High Iso, Jpegs and RAW. However, the major letdown of the X100 is its slow AF, which eventually led to it being sold in 2013. It was a parting which would lead me to search for a suitable replacement.
Panasonic GX1 (acquired in 2013)
This camera holds the distinction of being the only camera in my roster that was with me the shortest time - less than 24 hours!
I got one, second hand, and the first thing I noticed was its tendency to produce a bluish/purple tint. I am not a fan of Panasonic's colors. Olympus cams produced a slightly reddish tint especially in the shades. The Fuji X100 delivered stunning Jpegs and that's what I miss. Also, the AF of the GX1 with my lenses was not so pleasing to me, so I immediately had to dispose of this cam. I had to find a replacement. The Olympus EP3 came to mind. I immediately looked online for a unit, and it seemed the heavens were in my favor. The seller of the EP3 is looking for a GX1! Needless to say, I jumped at the opportunity for this trade.
This camera holds the distinction of being the only camera in my roster that was with me the shortest time - less than 24 hours!
I got one, second hand, and the first thing I noticed was its tendency to produce a bluish/purple tint. I am not a fan of Panasonic's colors. Olympus cams produced a slightly reddish tint especially in the shades. The Fuji X100 delivered stunning Jpegs and that's what I miss. Also, the AF of the GX1 with my lenses was not so pleasing to me, so I immediately had to dispose of this cam. I had to find a replacement. The Olympus EP3 came to mind. I immediately looked online for a unit, and it seemed the heavens were in my favor. The seller of the EP3 is looking for a GX1! Needless to say, I jumped at the opportunity for this trade.
Nikon P300 (acquired in 2013)
Before getting the Panasonic LX5, this was one of my other options. This has a slightly smaller sensor, but amazingly does a better job in Low Light. Tried it once during the Quiapo Fiesta, and it turned out remarkably well, with people mistaking its shots for a DSLR.
Before getting the Panasonic LX5, this was one of my other options. This has a slightly smaller sensor, but amazingly does a better job in Low Light. Tried it once during the Quiapo Fiesta, and it turned out remarkably well, with people mistaking its shots for a DSLR.
Olympus EP3 (acquired in 2013)
Finally a worthy sidekick for the OMD! The EP3 does everything well (though not as well as the OMD). There is little to dislike about it...except that its sensor is quite old now. Coupled with the excellent 12mm, this camera wipes the floor with the rest of them. Its images show a bit more grain though.
Finally a worthy sidekick for the OMD! The EP3 does everything well (though not as well as the OMD). There is little to dislike about it...except that its sensor is quite old now. Coupled with the excellent 12mm, this camera wipes the floor with the rest of them. Its images show a bit more grain though.
Ricoh GR (acquired in 2013)
The 5th version of their GR line. The GR looks great on paper and although its lens can do only 2.8, I thought that wouldn't be much of a problem. I had this for about a week, and although yes it Auto Focuses faster than the X100, its Jpegs are still no match for the X100. I tried the GR on a number of occasions, and found its colors to be a bit bland and not sharp enough when shooting indoors. I really liked how inconspicuous it looks. People have mistaken it for a film cam. Perfect looks for doing street photography...but it was a letdown for me in the IQ department. Not that it has bad IQ. It's quite good, but that the same league of the X100 which I am looking for. I haven't found the successor to the X100 yet.
The 5th version of their GR line. The GR looks great on paper and although its lens can do only 2.8, I thought that wouldn't be much of a problem. I had this for about a week, and although yes it Auto Focuses faster than the X100, its Jpegs are still no match for the X100. I tried the GR on a number of occasions, and found its colors to be a bit bland and not sharp enough when shooting indoors. I really liked how inconspicuous it looks. People have mistaken it for a film cam. Perfect looks for doing street photography...but it was a letdown for me in the IQ department. Not that it has bad IQ. It's quite good, but that the same league of the X100 which I am looking for. I haven't found the successor to the X100 yet.
Sony RX100 (acquired in 2014)
I sold my GR, and got an RX100 instead. Blazing fast AF. Shoots well outdoors. Sharp, colors are good, and does panorama! Movie mode gives excellent videos. Small and light. Does everything well enough, but it somehow still leaves me wanting when shooting under low light conditions. Its images look digital, and somehow lacks a signature, lacks character. Finally decided to put it up for sale. I was hoping it would fill the gap left by the X100...but even though the RX100 beats the X100 in terms of quickness, the IQ department still belongs to the X100.
I sold my GR, and got an RX100 instead. Blazing fast AF. Shoots well outdoors. Sharp, colors are good, and does panorama! Movie mode gives excellent videos. Small and light. Does everything well enough, but it somehow still leaves me wanting when shooting under low light conditions. Its images look digital, and somehow lacks a signature, lacks character. Finally decided to put it up for sale. I was hoping it would fill the gap left by the X100...but even though the RX100 beats the X100 in terms of quickness, the IQ department still belongs to the X100.
Samsung NX300 (acquired in 2014)
While I was still in the process of selling the RX100, an opportunity presented itself. I was able to get hold of an NX300 at a good price, and so I jumped on the opportunity. I sold a lens (45mm Olympus) in exchange for this.
I still haven't been able to fully test this cam, but one bright sunny day, I was able to test this using the kit lens, and was blown at how well the images turned out. I can only imagine how a prime would perform. The images were full of color (near X100) and the focus was obviously a lot faster than the X100. I may have found the replacement for the X100. In good daylight, this camera + kit lens combo does outstandingly well. Colors and Sharpness are extremely pleasing. Tried this combo once at a Vegetable Market, and it performed excellently.
While I was still in the process of selling the RX100, an opportunity presented itself. I was able to get hold of an NX300 at a good price, and so I jumped on the opportunity. I sold a lens (45mm Olympus) in exchange for this.
I still haven't been able to fully test this cam, but one bright sunny day, I was able to test this using the kit lens, and was blown at how well the images turned out. I can only imagine how a prime would perform. The images were full of color (near X100) and the focus was obviously a lot faster than the X100. I may have found the replacement for the X100. In good daylight, this camera + kit lens combo does outstandingly well. Colors and Sharpness are extremely pleasing. Tried this combo once at a Vegetable Market, and it performed excellently.
Canon Vixia HF M52 (acquired in 2013)
The time has come to look for a suitable "Semi-Pro" camcorder. At that time the Vixia looked like a winner as it brings a great low light sensor, coupled with a generous internal memory storage. The first wedding I used it turned out good, with the only thing I found wanting was a wider angle view. Also, converting the files for use in editors is a pain in the ....
The audio also can be a bit muffled at times, especially in big rooms.
The time has come to look for a suitable "Semi-Pro" camcorder. At that time the Vixia looked like a winner as it brings a great low light sensor, coupled with a generous internal memory storage. The first wedding I used it turned out good, with the only thing I found wanting was a wider angle view. Also, converting the files for use in editors is a pain in the ....
The audio also can be a bit muffled at times, especially in big rooms.
Panasonic GF3 (acquired in 2013)
A camera I got just because of the 14mm lens that is attached to it. The GF3 is a very cute looking camera, actually I think of it more as a Ladies' cam, compared to its predecessors. I haven't got the chance to test it fully, as I immediately put it on sale as soon as I got the 14mm lens.
A camera I got just because of the 14mm lens that is attached to it. The GF3 is a very cute looking camera, actually I think of it more as a Ladies' cam, compared to its predecessors. I haven't got the chance to test it fully, as I immediately put it on sale as soon as I got the 14mm lens.
Samsung NX100 (acquired in 2014)
Again, a camera I had only for a little while. The NX100 gives clean shots, but its resolution is limiting. Having used an NX300 prior to using the NX100, one can see the big difference between the two.
Again, a camera I had only for a little while. The NX100 gives clean shots, but its resolution is limiting. Having used an NX300 prior to using the NX100, one can see the big difference between the two.
Samsung NX1000 (acquired in 2014)
The NX1000, a much better improvement compared to the NX100, but a bit below the NX300 in terms of overall performance. I had this only for a about a week, and I haven't really tested it as I only got it for its attached 30mm lens.
The NX1000, a much better improvement compared to the NX100, but a bit below the NX300 in terms of overall performance. I had this only for a about a week, and I haven't really tested it as I only got it for its attached 30mm lens.
Olympus TG850 (acquired in 2014)
The replacement to my Sony TX5. The TG850 is the latest offing from Olympus, combining its usual ruggedness with a slew of new features. I was choosing between this and the TG2/3, but a couple of things pushed me to get this instead: 1. Flip Screen - useful for water horizon shots and of course, selfies! 2. Crazy 21mm angle - currently the widest angle of any point and shoot - as far as I know of - today. Selfies are a breeze and with that kind of angle you can easily get everything in the picture.
The replacement to my Sony TX5. The TG850 is the latest offing from Olympus, combining its usual ruggedness with a slew of new features. I was choosing between this and the TG2/3, but a couple of things pushed me to get this instead: 1. Flip Screen - useful for water horizon shots and of course, selfies! 2. Crazy 21mm angle - currently the widest angle of any point and shoot - as far as I know of - today. Selfies are a breeze and with that kind of angle you can easily get everything in the picture.
Olympus EPL2 (acquired in 2014)
An unplanned purchase, but if I told you the price I got for it, you would buy one too. Got this as a backup body for my OMD-EM5. I also got a dedicated lens for it (Sigma 30mm 2.8).
An unplanned purchase, but if I told you the price I got for it, you would buy one too. Got this as a backup body for my OMD-EM5. I also got a dedicated lens for it (Sigma 30mm 2.8).
Olympus EPL2 (acquired in 2014)
My mainstay Point-and-shoot. I chose between this, the LX7 and Canon S120. Honestly, the review of Ming Thein cemented my decision to go for an XZ2 over the others. With my experience of general image sharpness from my previous micro four thirds Olympus Cameras, I reasoned I wouldn't go wrong with the XZ2. Works great but the size is quite bulky. I might go replace it again.
My mainstay Point-and-shoot. I chose between this, the LX7 and Canon S120. Honestly, the review of Ming Thein cemented my decision to go for an XZ2 over the others. With my experience of general image sharpness from my previous micro four thirds Olympus Cameras, I reasoned I wouldn't go wrong with the XZ2. Works great but the size is quite bulky. I might go replace it again.